The Gram Panchayat Bhawanipur @ Mahkepi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1995 of 2016
1. The Gram Panchayat Bhawanipur @ Mahkepi Janpad Panchayat Kusmi District Balrampur Chhattisgarh Through Its Sarpanch Sukrita Panna D/o Bhushan Lakda, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bhawanipur @ Mahkepi, Tahsil Kusmi, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh
3. The Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Balrampur Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh
4. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Kusmi, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner None For Respondent/State Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 16/03/2017 1.
Perused.
2.
The writ petition has been preferred by the Gram Panchayat seeking a direction to the Collector, Balrampur-Ramanujganj,
to decide its representation by which the Gram Panchayat had sought assistance from the Collector to provide necessary protection/assistance in the on going construction of new Panchayat building.
3.
The prayer has been made on the ground that some villagers are obstructing construction, therefore, the administration should come forward to allow the construction being raised in an uninterrupted manner.
4.
The petitioner has not disclosed as to whether there is any official interference or any interference by any officer of the Department in his personal capacity. The petitioner has not named the villagers also who are obstructing in raising the construction. The allegations in the petition are vague. If the obstruction is made by some villagers in their individual capacity, the petitioner has remedy to prefer duly constituted suit seeking temporary or permanent injunction. 5.
In view of the above, the writ petition is not maintainable. It is accordingly disposed with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri