Mayaram Shatranj v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3019 of 2019

1. Mayaram Shatranj S/o Shri Rehsam Lal Shatranj Aged About 51 Years Govt. Primary School, Nagjhar, Block Malkhrauda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

2. Dhansai Navrang S/o Shri V R Navarang, Govt. Primary School Nagjhar, Block Malkharouda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education, Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The District Eduction Officer Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

3. The Block Education Officer Block Education Office, Malkhroda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/04/2019

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners stands squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxenas Vs. State of MP & Ors. 2009 (3) MPJR (SC) 59.

2. The issue pertains to grant of two advance increments on successful completion of B.Ed. course before appointment on own expenses.

3. On verification, counsel for the State submits that the matter can be disposed of for consideration of the petitioners' case in the light of decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxena (Supra).

4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the counsel for either side, the present petition stands

-2disposed of. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of two advance increments as per circulars prevailing in the State Government after verification of the facts pleaded by the petitioners, and in case if it is found that the petitioners are similarly placed, appropriate benefit be provided to him forthwith.

5. Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved