← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3636/2016disposed off

Dr. Jitendra Bahadur Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

W.P.(S)No.3636/2016 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.3636 of 2016 Dr. Jitendra Bahadur Singh, S/o P.N. Singh, aged about 61 years, R/o Namnakala, Ambikapur, P.S. and Post Ambikapur, Civil and Revenue District Surguja at Ambikapur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Animal Husbandry/ Veterinary Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Director, Veterinary Services Department, Indravati Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Dr. S.P. Singh, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, DDVS Officer, Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.)

4. Dr. Tanveer Ahmad, S/o Shri Sriraj Ahmad, aged about 54 years, R/o Mominpura, Mahamaya Road, Ambikapur, P.S. and Post Ambikapur, Civil and Revenue District Surguja at Ambikapur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate.

For Respondents No.1 and 2/State:- Mr. Prasoon Kumar Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate.

For Respondent No.4:

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/11/2016

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is senior to respondent No.4 on the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeon and charge of Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, has been given to respondent No.4. He would further submit that there is no departmental enquiry pending against the petitioner. Therefore, the State may be directed to examine the matter afresh in light of circular dated 4-8-2011 and 14-7-2014.

W.P.(S)No.3636/2016

2. The prayer is fair and reasonable.

3. The State Government / respondent No.1 is directed to consider and take fresh decision as to who should man the post of Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Ambikapur within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Interim order dated 11-82016 passed by this Court shall be in force till the decision of the State / respondent No.1 in this regard.

4.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma