← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1362/2019disposed off

Madhusudan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1362 of 2019 Madhusudan S/o Ramadhar Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Sakrali, Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh,

4. Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Sub-Divisilnal Officer (Revenue) Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh,

5. Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Dabhra, Water Resources Department Janjgir Raipur, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh,

6. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Rural Development Department Of Land Resources, Government Of India, Krishi Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road New Delhi 110001, ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :

Mr. Tarun Dansena, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 to 4 :

Mr. Sumit Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 5 :

Mr. B. Gopakumar, Asst. S.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 10.04.2019 Heard 1.

In the instant petition, the grievance raised by the petitioners is that the multiplier for grant of compensation as against the acquisition of land has not been properly applied and as per the order passed by the Division Bench and different orders of this Court, multiplier 2 should have been applied.

2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that for the present the petitioners may be allowed to make a fresh representation in view of the order passed by this Court on 06.02.2019 in WPC No. 1649/2017. 3.

Learned State Counsel does not object to filing of fresh representation, which may be decided by the State.

4.

In view of the above position, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners make a fresh representation within a period of four weeks from today along-with the copy of the order dated 06.02.2019 passed in WPC No. 1649/2017 and other documents, the concerned respondents shall consider and decide the same within a further period of ten weeks from the date of presentation of copy of this order.

Sd/- - ( Goutam Bhaduri ) JUDGE Vishakha