← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2644/2019disposed off

Smt. Nalini Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2644 of 2019 Smt. Nalini Shukla W/o Shri Ashwani Shukla Aged About 37 Years Assistant Teacher Presently Working As Govt. Primary School Khamtarai, Block- Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Block- Bilha, District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, on behalf of Mr.

Anil Mourya, Advocates For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/04/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the petitioner though was appointed vide order dated 21/06/2005 but on completion of probation period, the petitioner has not been provided the annual increment that she was entitled for.

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that similarly placed persons are drawing much more salary than the petitioner. Further grievance of

the petitioner is that the petitioner has approached the authorities in the department on repeated occasions but till date no decision has been taken by the authorities so far as annual increment from the date of completion of probation period is concerned.

3. Given the limited dispute that the petitioner has, let case of the petitioner be duly processed by the respondent No. 4 and 5 so far as her entitlement for annual increment is concerned from the date of completion of probation period. The respondent No. 4 & 5 shall take a final decision at the earliest preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise respondent No. 4 & 5 so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit