High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2227/2015disposed off

Pitambar Lal Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-12-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2227 of 2015 • Pitambar Lal Rathore S/o Shri Babulal Rathore, Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Nariyara, Tahsil & Police Station Akaltara, Civil & Revenue District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue), Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Tahsildar, Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

5. M/s K.S.K. Mahanadi Power Company Limited, Hyderabad, Plant Nariyara, Through Ajay Agrawal, Assistant Manager (Liaisoning), Tahsil & Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Ramkumar Rathore, S/o Babulal Rathore,

7. Goleram, S/o Rup Rai Rathore

8. Smt. Chandrika Bai, W/o Sanichram Rathore, Respondents 6 to 8 are resident of Village Nariyara, Tahsil and Police Station Akaltara, Civil and Revenue District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 11/12/2015 Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

(2) The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the Commissioner in appellate proceedings, which originates from exercise of powers for correction of record under the provisions of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

(3) The impugned order is revisable under Section 50 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

(4) Learned State Counsel would submit that he is ready and willing to prefer a Revision Application before the Board of Revenue. (5) In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, the petitioner prefers a duly constituted Revision Application before the Board of Revenue within 30 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Board of Revenue in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna