Ravi Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7316 of 2015 1.
Ravi Kaushik S/o. Makhan , Aged about 27 years 2.
Kapil Diwakar S/o. Bhagwat, Aged about 24 years. Both R/o. of Village Gochhiya, P.S. and Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Applicants :- Shri Ayay Ayachi, Advocate For Respondent/ State :- Shri S.R. J. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board By 04/01/2016 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 379/2015 registered at Police Station- Kawardha, District - Kabirdham (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the C.G. Excise Act.
2.
The prosecution alleges that the applicants were found to be in possession of illicit liquor measuring about 14.400 bulk liters and they were arrested on 01.12.2015 .
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have falsely been implicated in this case and they are in jail since 01.12.2015; therefore, they may be released on bail.
4. Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however, he would submit that as per the information received
from the concerned SHO, the applicants have no previous antecedents of similar offence.
5. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the quantity of seized liquor is 14.400 bulk liters; offence is triable by the JMFC and the applicants are in jail since 01.12.2015; this Court is inclined to release the applicants on bail. 6.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.
7.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for their appearance as and when directed. 8.
It is made clear that if the applicants are found to be involved in similar offence again, this order granting bail to the applicants shall automatically stand canceled without reference to the Court and the concerned police shall be at liberty to re-arrest the applicants in this case also, after informing the concerned Judicial Magistrate where trial is pending.
9.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Santosh