Manoj Kumar Sharma v. The Raipur Munci. Corp.

•^-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

REVIEWPETITION \67~QF2Q12 (Arising out ofjudgement and order dated 21-08-2012 passed by the Hon'ble 9ol DIVISION BENCH III in WPC No. ^82 of2012] ^w^'^ APPLICANT/ PETITIONER:- Manoj KumarSharma, S/0 Shri-Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged 34 ygars, R/0 "Kanti Kunj",0pp.

,1^'

E-i l^-i .J^-^fo^c:

s^S^'-^-^ w^w^^^ Shriram Health Club, Dangania, Raipur(CG).

VERSUS

NON-APPLICANT:

The Raipur Municipal Corporation.

RESPONDENT.

Throughits Commissioner, Raipur (CG).

ffyAt^ AcA^, 2i-oe-2^f2-- ]p<^a^ b^ REVIEW PETITION K^AD-WffHARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA -tl^H^.'kt-^^ st%S^%J^Cm^ </'^%^ o

IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE IVIR.T.P. SHARIVIA^& HON'BLE WIR. I.S. UBOWEJA, JJ Review Petition No. 167 of 2012 Applicant/ Petitioner Manoj Kumar Sharma versus The Raipur Municipal Corporation Non-aDpJLcant/ Respondents Appearance; 'ia-,rii '?a'" "• !

• 8% Mr. H.C. Shukla, counsel for the petitioner.

ORDER

(11.03.2015) T.P. SHARMA, J 1.

This is petition for review of order dated 21.08.2012 passed in bunch:matterinoluaingW.P.(C)No.901/2012.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that shop has already been allotted to the petitioner, therefore, the review petition becomes infructuous.

3.

Consequently, the review petition is dismissed as having becqme infructuous.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge Sd/- Inder Singh Uboweja Judge Vijay