High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/10/2003disposed off

Himanchal Shandilya And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition No.10 of 2003

1. Himanchal Shandilya, S/o Shambhu Dayal Tiwari, Aged about 54 years, occupation service presently posted as Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG).

2. Balram Prasad Gupta, S/o late Dwaraka Pd. Gupta, aged about 53 years, occupation service presently holding post of Assistant Secretary and posted in the office of the Managing Director, Commissioner, Rajya Krishi Vipanan Board, Raipur (CG). ... Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG).

2. The Managing Director/Commissioner, Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipanan Board, Purani Ganjmandi Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents Writ Petition No.558 of 2005

1. Balram Prasad Gupta, S/o late Dwaraka Prasad Gupta, aged about 54 years, occupation service presently posted as Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Rajnandgaon (CG).

2. Himanchal Shandilya, S/o Shambhu Dayal Tiwari, Aged about 57 years, occupation service presently posted as Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Kasdol, District Raipur (CG).

... Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG).

2. The Managing Director/Commissioner, Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipanan Board, Purani Ganjmandi Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Madhya Pradesh Rajya Mandi Board through its Managing Director, 26, Arera Hills, Jail Road, Kisan Bhawan, Bhopal. ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Animesh Verma, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri D.R. Minj, Govt. Advocate.

For Respondent No.2 :

Shri Rahul Kumar, Advocate on behalf of Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate.

For Respondent No.3 :

Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate (in WP No.558 of 2005.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/12/2017 1.

Both the writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking for issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider their case for promotion to the post of Secretary, Grade-III.

-22.

The respondent-State has filed its reply wherein it has been stated that the petitioners case has since been considered and vide order dated 29.06.2005 (Annexure R-1/1) they have been granted pay scale of the post of Secretary (Junior) w.e.f. 15.09.2003 onwards. Based on the said order dated 29.06.2005, learned counsel for the respondents submit that the grievance of the petitioners has since been redressed and nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon. 3.

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these petitions may be disposed of in the light of the order dated 29.06.2005 reserving their rights to prefer a representation if any claim still has not been granted by the respondents. 4.

Accordingly, in the light of the order dated 29.06.2005, whereby the petitioners have been granted pay scale of Secretary (Junior) w.e.f. 15.09.2003, both the petitions stand disposed of. However, it is made clear that in the event if the petitioners have any grievance which has not been redressed till now, they would be at liberty to make a suitable representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievance.

5. Accordingly, both the petitions stand disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- (P.Sam Koshy) Judge inder