Baijnath Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1122 of 2018 Baijanth SahuS/o Late Harishchandra Sahu, aged about 55 years, R/o Village - Kamalpur, Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, P.S. - Raghunathpur, District - Balrampur, Ramanujganj (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary of Food Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. District Marketing Federation Balrampur, through Secretary of Krishi Upaj Mandi Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.)

3. Collector Balrampur, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj (C.G.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer (R), Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur, Ramnujganj (C.G.)

5. Tahsildar, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj (C.G.)

6. Adamjati Seva Sahkari Samity, Paddy receive sub-center, Wadrafnagar, through Branch Manager of Adimjati Seva Sahkari Samity, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj (C.G.)

7. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Ramanujganj, through the Secretary of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, District Balrampur, Ramanujganj (C.G.)

8. Police Chauki- Balangi, through Station House Officer of Police Chauki - Balangi, Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, P.S. - Raghunathpur, District BalrampurRamanujganj (C.G.) --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/04/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by memo dated 15.01.2018, the paddy in question has been seized by the

respondent authority and the matter is pending before the Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, District Balrampur.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to move appropriate application before the Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, District Balrampur, who, in turn, shall consider the application and take final decision on the said proceedings expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after hearing the parties.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka