Tikaram v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

Wm MWWWMMMWMNWwwmum MW v w mum t '~.wm\ummu~mw BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'TISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 9,9,? 2}"

of 2014 W.P.

NO.

/,V PETITION ER Tikaram son of Dev Slngh Agharlya, ....'....

aged about 66'"

years, R/o.

/'Pandaripani (East), P.S.

Chakradhar /)(\\'&f> Nagar, Tahsil and District Raigarh (CG-L \\\\\

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through 1.

The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur C.G.), Commissioner, Biiaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.), Sub Divisionai Officer (Revenue) Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), Narayan Prasad Thawait, son of Chakradhar Thawait, Laxmi Prasad Thawait, son of Chakradhar Thawait No.2 & are R/o.

Pandaripani (East), P.S.

Chakradhar Nagar, Tahsii and District Raigarh (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1.

...,.....PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P.(C) No.2277 of 2014 PETITIONER Tikaram

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Present :- Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Smiti Sharma, Dy. GA for the State.

ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 29th Day of January, 2015) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

The impugned order has been passed in appellate jurisdiction by the Commissi_oner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur which arose out of proceedings under Section of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959.

2.

The impugned order is revisable before the Board of Revenue.

The petitioner has alternative remedy to challenge the impugned order. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ASHU