← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3099/2018allowed

Pradeep Kumar Sen v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3099 of 2018

1. Pradeep Kumar Sen S/o S/o Nand Kumar Sen Aged About 37 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sidesar, Block Kanker, Disrict Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

2. Kishori Bhatpare D/o D/o G. N. Bhatpare Aged About 29 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Baradwar- Basti, Block Sakti, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, North Bastar Kanker, District- North Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Janjgir- Champa, District- JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Shri Jeet Patel, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 17/04/2018 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and the action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti