Gokaran Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

@ ^ ^ '^^iES^ w a syi-s' N "tpl :iiW S.B. fService Matter)

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

BILASPUR (CHH_ATTLSGARH) WRIT PETITIQNfSl N0, ^ ^^/2014.

PETITIONER:

Gokaran Singh, son of Late Ram Sharan Singh, aged about 42 years, working as Sub Engineer, ^ l,^-^-^ y..^"-r"\ ^ < *fcT-j- -•••"^^- C^-S4;"^""1...- Champa Division, P.W.D. Champa Division, District Janjgir-Champa, ^,;. - j^f'l*:""'

_.»<I'**a*"

Chhattisgarh.

Versus

Respondents 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, F'ublic Works Deparbment, Mantralaya, P.S.Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur, P.S. City Kotwali Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, P.S.Civil Line, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Champa Division, P.S.

Janjgir, Sistrict Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226, QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA <<

.iXK-HC-78 ^^^"i WMf^ ^SBt rtliqidq, yTDwK?, RlClltfy.

MWvA\ 3wN.C^./?%.M<':-..^'..7/..a..^ 2014 a.o^i q^i ('^'Iyip) ^aiSR^aan^t ^)i*il^ft'i Ni»iptT^f^i<Q<FJI^|^ ^isiRiiiw^ sn^^i R.ij* TWT^TT^%sh*l SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 24.12.2014 •-^ Shri CJK Rao, counsel f(| r the petitioner.

Shri Mazid Ali, Panel Lajwyer for the State, on advance copy.

With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally.

Learned counsel appeailing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initia]|ly appointed as Sub Engineer on ad hoc basis on 25.8.1993 against the clear vacant post.

.was continued with artificial The services of the petitioneij break of two or three dd continuously till the date ys in service and worked of his regularization.

The petitfoner was given the benef^ts of annual increments. The similarly situated ei|aployees have approached the State Adminisfrative Tribunaj (for short "SAT") in Original Application No. 1979/91 (Satt) M.P. and another) praying for this petition. Leamed couns^ sh, Kumar Mandloi Vs State of similar relief as sought for in 1 appearing for the petitioner submits that this case may all po be disposed off in the same terms and conditions.

- Shri Mazid Ali, leamedl fcounsel for the State in the light of the order of the SAT} as aibrestated, submits fhat

f^.

1 ^<gpS'iXlHC-78 f S:

'^f^/:

^53 •<4l^l?t«, UTT|'M<I<», Rfell'dy ^IHpll sti+ll^................................^T^ 201 sn^r ti5RR (ijci^d^.T) <*iT^Frt<n'f H!»ft4l'?f^t^ ?Ril<i3i< ^isiRm air^i OT^rqn R-ii* ?WT3ll^shNr<h after verifying the facts of the :ase, petitioner's case shall be considered.

?<c In view of the foregoir} g and categorical statement made by fhe learned counsel) appearing for the State, this petition is allowed iri the san^e terms i.e. if the Committee finds the petitioner suitable ^[or the post ih all respect, he shall be regularized on the pcjst held by him and shall also pay him salary on regular cale. He shall be entitled to salary for the dates on break in sendce. His seniority shall initial appointmenf.

be counted from the date ofhi No costs.

Praveen ~*<