← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5037/2015disposed off

Vishal Ram Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.5037 of 2015 Vishal Ram Sonwani, S/o Shri Bullu Sonwani, aged about 45 years, R/o. Village Koni, Thana Koni, Tahsil and District Bilaspur.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur.

2. State of Chhattigarh, through its Secretary, Department of General Administration, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur.

3. Collector, District Bilaspur.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zanpat Panchayat, Bilha, District Bilaspur.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/01/2016 (1) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Kangi House Moharrir and Water Pump Operator in Gram Panchayat, Koni, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur and he has been appointed as a Daily Wage Employee prior to 31.12.1997. He would submit that in spite of there being decision by the State Government as reflecting in the circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure P/3) for consideration case for

regularization of such daily wager who have been appointed during the period from 01.01.1989 to 31.12.1997, their cases have not been considered.

(2) This Court has gone through the papers annexed with the writ petition. In the opinion of this Court, for the present, this writ petition deserves to be disposed of with a direction to the concerned competent authority to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in view of the circular dated 05.03.2008.

(3) Accordingly, it is directed that petitioner's case for regularization be considered and speaking order be passed within the parameter laid down in the circular dated 05.03.2008 and necessary orders in this regard be passed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (4) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the petitioner case for regularization shall be considered strictly in accordance with the norms laid down in the circular dated 05.03.2008. (5) With the above observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-