Smt. Meena Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (S) No.5290 of 2016 Smt. Meena Sinha, W/o. Shri M. Sinha, aged about 44 years, Presently working as Daily wager at South Division, Kondagaon, Post Thana, Tahsil & Distt.-Kondagaon (CG) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (CG)
2. Conservator of Forest, Kanker, District-South Baster, Kanker (CG)
3. Divisional Forest Officer, South Kondagaon, Division-Kondagaon, Distt-Kondagaon (CG) ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr.Somkant Verma, Advocate For State : Mr.Avinash Singh, P.L.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board /12/2016
1. Heard.
2. Case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as daily wage worker in the office of Divisional Forest Officer, Division-Raipur in the year 1990. But later on, he was removed from the work in the year 1993. Petitioner has come to know that State Authority have taken a policy decision by issuing Circular dated 5.3.2008 (Annexure P-1) to consider cases of daily wage employees for regularization.
3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, though several representations have been made, they have not so far been decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon direction issued by this Court on 29.1.2009 in WP (S) No.545/2009, wherein
under similar circumstances, petition was disposed of with direction for consideration.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No.3 raising all grievances raised in this petition. On such representation being made, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No.3 on its own merits in the light of Circular of Annexure P-1 dated 5.3.2008, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. Sd/- (Sanjay K Agrawal) Judge B/-