Jitendra Ku. Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.
of 201 Jitendra Kumar Sahu, S/o Kasiram, aged about 42 years, R/o Janakpur Road, Ward No.-13, P.S.-Takthpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Aadim Jati & Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Department Of Aadim Jati & Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Chhattisgarh Dist. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Assistant Commissioner, Department of Aadim Jati & Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Chhattisgarh, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State : Smt. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 1 2 / 01 /201 Heard.
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is working as Class IV employee on monthly basis at collector rate in Hostel and he is entitled for grant of pay scale as per circular dated 04th November, 2016 issued by respondent No.1/State Government and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation before respondent No. 3 i.e. Collector, Bilaspur for redressal of his grievances and direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously.
(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
(3) In view of above, the petitioner is permitted to file representation before respondent No.3 i.e. Collector, Bilaspur. If such representation is made by the petitioner within 15 days from today, respondent No. 3 shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner in the light of circular dated 04th November, 2016 preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with representations of the petitioner.
(4) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law. (5) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge D/-