Sushil Kumar v. Vinod Dubey

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 822 of 2016

1. Sushil Kumar S/o Late Ramkeshwar Mishra, Aged About 38 Years

2. Rajendra Kumar S/o Late Mahavir Prasad Mishra, Aged About 43 Years Both R/o Village- Rajketa, Tahsil- Wadrafnagar, P.S.- Wadrafnagar, DistrictBalrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, Civil District- Surguja (Ambikapur), Revenue District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Vinod Dubey S/o Late Kanhai Dubey, Aged About 19 Years R/o VillageRajketa, Tahsil- Wadrafnagar, P.S.- Wadrafnagar, District- BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh, Civil District- Surguja (Ambikapur), Revenue District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

2. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Balrampur DistrictBalrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Applicants :

Shri AK Prasad, Advocate For Respondent No.2/State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/11/2016 I.A. No.1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

It is ordered, as prayed for.

M.C.C. No.

This is an application for restoration of WP227 No.518/2016 which was dismissed for non-compliance of Court order dated 30.08.2016.

On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WP227 No.518/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number, subject , however, on payment of cost of Rs.1000/- to HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu