Minor Raju Pawle v. State Of Chhattisgarh
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT
BILASPUR CRIMINAL REVISION N0.
1-1 /2014 APPLICANT:
Minor Raju Pawle, son of Qhanpal Pawle, aged about 13 years, caste Gond, resident of village Kapatbahri, police station Sitapur, District Surguja;
through his guardian father Dhanpal Pawle, son of Dhobsai, aged about 45 years, caste Gond, resident of village village Kapatbahri, police station Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.) .^'
...••^..-•'
^\^y.^ .....%^''""
...••-;:^r..^"
^'^ 'L^'...
VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Police Station House Officer, police station Bagicha, District Jashpur (Chhatttisgarh) NON-APPLICANT:
Crinae No.:
100/2014 Juvenile Case No.:
31/2014--"
isj^.
36^'36^& 376 ofIPC A A- Po sw ft^^- W:!'-L''
Offence U/S.:
Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) Police station:
Civil SB Revenue District:
Jashpur (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 53 OF THE JITVENILE JUSTICE (CARE & PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT. 2000 Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order dated 27.09.2014 passed by the Court of learned AdditTonal Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Jashpur, District Jashpur and^presided over by Shri Sudhir Kumar in Criminal Appeal No.50/2014 parties being MINOR RAJU PAWLE vs.
STATE OF CG, the applicant has preferred instant criminal revision before this Honourable High Court. The certified copy of the impugned order dated 27.09.2014 is enclosed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE-A/^for its kind perusal of the Honourable Court.
The learned Court below has not properiy appreciated the facts & grounds raised by the applicant and has also not considered the contents of the mandatoiy provisions enshrined under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care SE Protection of Children) Act, 2000, (hereinafter referred as 'Act, 2000') before passing the impugned ^ \A^1
order. Hence, this revision is being preferred before the Honourable Court on the following facts 8s grounds amongst others.
^eg ^traRPf, Wt«*i<?, &<?>wy ^N. ^.: .^. ^^.. ff; ^/.^281 ^ VWvfl ^H|tt> ail^ilf5ffi ( <kWi(+s(l.l Wttti.(l-8fe'^'?f5R3R ^aRiiisn^i ^Rn^'BfSaM^ Wt!ailS«5Wt : Hon bie Shri -Soutsm <-t II e'i tor s applicant.
Mr. V.K. Pandey, couri^ Mr.A'vind Shukla, P.L.
IbrtheState/non-appiicant, Hean T'his revision is direi(ed agamst the ordsr dated 27-09-2014 assed by the Mditional Ses^lona Judge (Fast Track Court), Jashpur in Crimsnal ADpeal No. 50/2014 vAierein Ihe order under chailenge dates 20-68-2014 passed by fte Juvenile Jsjstice Board, Jashpur on an 'avMe under Sedion 12 of frse Juvenile .it__^*-_ _£ '.
appllcaaon ot juveraie KBJU Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Ad, 2QOO dismissing ihe said application ofihe juvenile hastbeen aflirmed and the criirinat appeal has been dismissed. Tne said ordfer dated 27-Q9-2014 dismissln.g.The cnminat appeal 1s under Ghallenge in|die Instent revislon dled on be'natf ofthe luvenile.
edinfl for Ihe apDlicai iViuvenile submite ttiat Learnea counsei appes id to he 28-06-2014 and ttie juveniie 'fias Ihe date of inddent vms Nleg wa<la.^-mnT,-na$[- FS/t-7BOt+-2.(ia.o<M.
3%f -yi'yid-tl, yTfl'y'K,, I«ii?ii'My gfflW.. (^:.^. '^..Sl.^^ 201^ gn^[TR%(T[g^^) *WM-1 MWtiIfl !S><5 <fat^K ^iaifoian^ an^gq>ii5«f ?sng? ^gi^aa^ ^ •s ^ i^HSt^^N^ home on bsi! and be handed o er to the custody- of his mother gnd father nameiy, Pnuleshv/ari gnd Dhart?a lf.l!*h ll-.a Witti Cne above dlrecnon ihe revisiori stands ailowed.
^.u. as perruiss.
Goutam Bhaduri Judge wSa^insn. 'aagi- FS/l-70oi4-2.oo.ooal^- 8!1 Ifl