← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5826/2016dismissed

Hirade Ram Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-10-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.5826 of 2016 Hirade Ram Netam, aged about 43 years, S/o Budhuram Netam, R/o Village Achoti Vikas Khand Khurud, District Dhamtari (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

2.

Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

3.

Collector, District Dhamtari (CG).

4.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Dhamtari (CG).

5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kurud, District Dhamtari (CG).

6.

Gram Panchayat, through its Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Achoti Vikas Khand Khurud, District Dhamtari (CG). ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24/10/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 25.07.2016 passed by Respondent

No.4-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Dhamtari is appealable before the appellate authority ie. Respondent No.2Director, Panchayat, Raipur and, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority for redressal of his grievance within a period of 15 days from today. To this, counsel for the State has no objection.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority i.e. respondent No.2. If such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today and, in turn, the appellate authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merit after hearing of both the parties preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of appeal of the petitioner along with copy of this order. (5) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-