← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2734/2019disposed off

Rajani Dewangam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2734 OF 2019

1. Rajani Dewangam D/o Late Mem Bai Dewangan Aged About 32 Years R/o Kosthapara, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector Raigarh District Riagarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11.04.2019

1. The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the application for compassionate appointment filed by the petitioner.

2. The facts of the case is that, the petitioner is adopted daughter of late Mem Bai Dewangan who died in harness on 22.03.2017 while working as Peon at Govt. Primary School, Telikot, Kharsiya, District Raigarh. After death of the deceased employee late Mem Bai Dewangan, the petitioner, her adopted daughter, moved an application for compassionate appointment on which the respondents till date have not taken any final decision.

3. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if this petition is disposed of

with a direction to the respondent No.4 to take a decision on the application filed by the petitioner in accordance with rules and regulations governing the field and also considering the scheme for compassionate appointment prevailing at the relevant point of time.

4. Accordingly, expecting the respondent No.4 to take a decision at the earliest preferably within a period of four months, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder