Maharaja Swa Sahayta Samuh, Jujagu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2622 of 2016

1. Maharaja Swa Sahayta Samuh, Jujagu Through Its President Sobhita Paikra, D/o Shankar Sai Paikra, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Jujagu, Post Kurdeg, Block & Tahsil Bageecha, Distirct Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women & Child Development Department, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Women And Child Development, Department, Mantralaya Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgar

3. Collector, Jashpur, Distirct Jahspur Chhattisgarh

4. District Programme Officer, Women & Child Development, Department, Jashpur, Distirct Jashpur Chhattisgarh

5. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development, Project Sanna, Block Bageecha, Distirct Jashpur Chhattisgarh

6. Ujjwal Swa Sahayta Samuh, Kurdeg, Block Bageecha, Distirct Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri K.N. Nande, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri R.K. Mishra, Dy. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 26/10/2016

1.

The petitioner would assail the legality and validity of the order dated 22-8-2016 whereby the petitioner's agreement dated 13-8-2014 read with the supplementary agreement dated 31-8-2015 for supply of ready to eat food material to the Aangan Badi Centre of Jujagu sector has been cancelled. 2.

It is argued that in view of the terms and conditions of the agreement, such cancellation can be made only on recommendation of a Committee under the Chairmanship of District Collector whereas in the present case, the District Programme Officer has passed the order without giving any opportunity, which is in violation of principles of natural justice. Learned counsel would refer to the order passed by this Court in Jai Bhawani Sw Sahayta Samuh Sulesa v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others (WPC No.2433/2016, decided on 3.10.2016).

3.

Learned State Counsel would submit that if direction is issued, the concerned Collector shall be instructed to examine the matter and pass necessary order in accordance with law. 4.

In view of the above, the impugned order having been passed in violation of principles of natural justice, it deserves to be and is hereby set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Collector, Jashpur, who shall examine the complaint/irregularity committed

by the petitioner by a Committee as contemplated under the provisions of the agreement and based on the recommendation of the Committee, the Collector shall pass the order in accordance with law.

5.

Let the entire exercise be completed within a period of four months from today.

6.

It is made clear that till the matter is decided by the Collector, the petitioner shall continue to supply ready to eat food material to Aanganbadi Center, Jujagu, in accordance with the agreement. 7.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Gowri