High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/1181/2015disposed off

Rakesh Mohan Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 1181 of 2015 Rakesh Mohan Pandey S/o Late L.R. Pandey Aged About 45 Years Practising As An Advocate, In The High Court Of Chhattisgarh At Bilaspur, R/o 27 Kholi Bilaspur, P.S.

Civil Lines, Distt.

Bilaspur, CG.

Mo.No.

9893329480 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, CG.

2. The Inspector General Of Police Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, CG.

3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, CG .

4. The City Superintendent Of Police Near Civil Lines, Police Station Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, CG.

5. The Station House Officer Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur, Distt. Bilspur, CG.

6. Rakesh Sharma Proprietor M/s Shubham Builders And Developers, In Front Of F C I Godown, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, CG.

7. Vibhuti Singh S/o Arvind Kumar Singh R/o Zone 1, Plot No. 22, Vyapar Vihar, Main Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, CG

8. Ku. Jaya Dariyani Aged About 25 Years R/o Mittitel Line, Sindhi Colony, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur,CG.

---- Respondents Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Pandey, :

in person.

For Respondent No.1 to 5 :

Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 6 :

Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No. 7 :

Ms. Vijay Laxmi Soni, Advocate.

Order On Board 17/02/2016

1. Heard on motion.

2. On perusal of the material filed on behalf of the petitioner along with the petition, it is clear that the provisions of Section 156 of the Cr.P.C. would be first applied. Thereafter the authority under the law for issuance of any direction to any of the respondents would arise. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner has to explore the provisions of Section 156 of the Cr.P.C. for redressal of his grievances available under the law first.

3. In the opinion of this Court, instant CRMP is filed prematurely. Therefore, it is disposed of as premature. The petitioner is directed to take recourse of Section 156 of the Cr.P.C.

4. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Pathak