Asit Kumar Toppo v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2738 OF 2019

1. Asit Kumar Toppo S/o Shri Blacius Toppo Aged About 40 Years Presenty Working As Post Of Lecturer (Lb), Govt. Higher Secondary, School, Dipadih Kala, Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

2. Kherwar Ram S/o Shri Pardeshee Ram Aged About 48 Years Presenlty Working As Post Of Lecturer (Lb) Govt. Higher Secondary, School Dipadih Kala, Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Nilima Toppo W/o Shri Asit Kumar Toppo Aged About 36 Years Presently Working As Post Of Teacher (Lb), Govt. Middle School Sargawan, Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School, Education Department, Mahanadi, Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The District Education Officer Balrampur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer Shankargarh District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners :

Shri Manoj Chouhan, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11.04.2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 10 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of

State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

3. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioners are granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder