High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2785/2016dismissed

Sita Bai Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2785 of 2016

1. Sita Bai Dewangan W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Dewangan, Aged About 45 Years R/o Near Netaji Chowk, Arang, Police StationArang, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Shobha Singh Thakur, W/o Jitendra Singh Thakur, Aged About 40 Years R/o Kushalpur, Police Station D.D. Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Dhaniram Dewangan, S/o Shri Tulsiram Dwangan, Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No.6, Nagar Panchayat Dharsinwa, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Gramodhyog Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Director, Gamodhyog Department, Sonakhan Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development & Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited, B 26, Sector 7, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. M. M. Joshi, Posted As Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development & Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited, B 26, Sector 7, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitionerss Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. A.S. Kachhwaha, Addl. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board

10/11/2016

1. Heard.

2. The petitioners are not claiming any relief for themselves, they are claiming action against respondent No.5, who is the Secretary of Chhattisgarh State Handloom Development and Marketing Cooperative Federation Limited.

3. The prayer made in the writ petition is in the nature of pro bono. The writ petition is not maintainable in its present format. The petitioner, if so desires, may prefer a properly constituted WP(PIL).

4. The writ petition is dismissed, as not maintainable, with the liberty aforesaid. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna