Leelavati v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TPC No. 26 of 2020

1. Leelavati Wife Of Late Rajesh Kumar Aged About 21 Years Resident Of Caste - Korwa, Resident Of Village - Ruppur, Police Station- Basantpur, Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, District - Balrampur Chhattisgarh. At Present Godhanpur, Nagar Ambikapur, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil - Ambikapur, District-Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

2. Karan Son Of Late Rajesh Kumar Aged About 1 1/2 Years, Minor Represented Through Mother And Legal Guardian Petitioner No.

1. Resident Of Caste - Korwa, Resident Of Village - Ruppur, Police Station- Basantpur, Tahsil - Wadrafnagar, District - Balrampur Chhattisgarh. At Present Godhanpur, Nagar Ambikapur, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil - Ambikapur, District-Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Through The Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, DistrictSurguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Through The Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh. State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Wadrafnagar, District- Balrampur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

3. Suryajeet Jaiswal Son Of Anil Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 27 Years Resident Of Village - Pandri, Police Station - Raghunathnagar, District-Balrampur Chhattisgarh, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicants For Applicants :

Shri Rahul Mishra, Adv.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board 18.06.2020 1.

Heard on admission.

2.

Applicants have preferred Civil Suit No. B-06/2019 "Leelavati and Another Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Distribution Company Limited and others" before the First Additional District Judge, Ambikapur, District - Surguja. The nonapplicant filed written submission before that Court raising objection that jurisdiction does not lie in District Judge Ambikapur instead of it jurisdiction lies in District Judge Ramanujgang. The objection is still pending consideration before that Court. 3.

Looking to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that instant transfer petition is not fit for admission, in other words, the instant transfer petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed in limine.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE kishore