High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/39/2018dismissed

Smt. Kiranmayee Nayak v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-23Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPPIL No. 39 of 2018

1. Smt. Kiranmayee Nayak W/o Shri Vinod Nayak Aged About 49 Years R/o Nayak Advocate Chamber , Tatyapara , G. E. Road , Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Shri Vinod Nayak S/o Shri M. L. Nayak Aged About 54 Years R/o Nayak Advocate Chamber, Tatyapara, G E Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,

2. Anti Corruption Bureau / Economic Offences Wing , Through The Additional Director General Of Police In-Charge Near Telibandha Talab G E Road Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change Indira Paryavran Bhavan Jorbagh Road New Delhi - 110003

4. Brijmohan Agrawal S/o Shri R. L. Agrawal Aged About 58 Years Presently Agriculture Minister , Government Of Chhattisgarh , R/o Ramsagar Para , Police Station Maudhapara , Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. SC Verma, Advocate For Respondents 1 & 2/State Mr. J.K. Gilda, Advocate General For Respondent No.3/UOI Mr. B. Gopakumar, Assistant Solicitor General For Respondent No.4 Mr. Sameer Uraon, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 23/7/2018

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The return has been filed even by the Respondents' counsel.

3. Respondent No.3 seems to be a formal party.

4. Keeping in mind what has been stated in the affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 & 2, specially in para 4, this PIL stands disposed of.

5. Learned Advocate General takes a preliminary objection against maintainability of the PIL and he has brought instances as to how the Petitioners could be an interested party being directly aggrieved because of the lost political battle in the Assembly Elections held in the year 2013.

6. Irrespective of the same, since the Authority has taken cognizance of the matter, no further direction/order is required to be issued in this PIL.

7. The WP(PIL) stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Chief Justice Judge Shyna