High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4323/2017disposed off

Ramesh Kumar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4323 of 2017 Ramesh Kumar Patel S/o Tularam Patel, Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted And Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ghughuwa, Block Pussore, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer, Block Pussore, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. D.R. Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 31/08/2017 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 4.7.2017, in the case of one Tilak Ram Patel, UDT, the Govt. has passed specific order that who have been appointed on compassionate basis will not be deprived of two advance increments even if they have been appointed after 16.6.1993. He submits that the petitioner's case is similarly situated as Tilak Ram Patel.

2. After having gone through the order dated 4.7.2017, it is found that in the case of one Tilak Ram who was appointed on 27.9.1994 on compassionate basis has been held entitled for two advance increments even though he was appointed after 16.6.1993, on the premise that the earlier circular for grant of two advance increments to those who have obtained D.Ed. at their own expenses would not apply in cases of compassionate appointment. Therefore, in these circumstances, the case of the petitioner deserves consideration.

3. The petition is accordingly finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authority to examine petitioner's case on parity and grant similar benefit to the petitioner as has been extended to one Tilak Ram Patel, within a period of three months.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha