Sandeep Kumar Gorla v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4189 of 2017 Sandeep Kumar Gorla S/o Shri Ramaiya Gorla, Aged About 31 Years Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Working At Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block- Jagdalpur, District- Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Woman And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Dy.Director, Agriculture Department, Jagdalpur, District - Jagdalpur At Bastar Chhattisgarh
3. Shri Kamlesh Kumar Pant Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Working At Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block-Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :
Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 30/08/2017 Heard.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has remained posted continuously in scheduled area for the last 5 years, by impugned order, he has again been transferred to another scheduled area. He submits that in such case, there is a policy of the State Government to consider posting outside the scheduled area under clause 2.1 of circular dated 03.06.2015.
2. It is found that the petitioner has approached this Court without preferring any representation in that regard. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the transfer order. It will, however, be open for the petitioner to prefer representation
before the competent authority to claim posting outside the scheduled area according to the Government Policy within a period of ten days from today. If such representation is made, the competent authority shall take a decision on the representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with copy of this order. For a period of four weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, provided nobody has joined at the place of the petitioner.
3. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha