← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4479/2017disposed off

Gopi Ram Dhimar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4479 of 2017 • Gopi Ram Dhimar S/o Shri Siya Ram Dhimar, Aged About 49 Years R/o Kilapara, Ward No.41, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Department And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Mission Director, National Urban Livelihood Mission (N U L M) O/o State Urban Development Authority (S U D A), 4th Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector/ President, District Urban Development Authority, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Manish Nigam, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/09/2017 Heard.

1.

The grievance ventilated through this petition is that though the petitioner has been continuing as daily wage employee since 1991, his claim for regularization has not been considered and no final decision taken. It is submitted that in view of the policy of regularization promulgated by the State Govt. on 5.3.2008, later on made applicable in the local bodies vide letter dated 3.4.2008 and 1.9.2008, the petitioner's case ought to be considered. 2.

Learned counsel for respondents/State submits that respondents would

be scrutinizing the petitioner's claim of regularization in accordance with the applicable policy of regularization and appropriate decision in accordance with law would be taken within a reasonable time.

3.

Having considered the submission and statement so made by learned counsel for respondents, I deem it expedient to dispose off the matter at this stage with a direction to respondents to examine petitioner's claim for regularization strictly in accordance with law and policy of regularization applicable in the case and take a decision one way or the other within a period of 4 months.

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed off.

SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane