State Of Chhattisgarh v. Raj Kamal Mishra

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 825 of 2016

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Raj Kamal Mishra, Aged About 61 Years, S/o Shri Chandra Bhushan Mishra, Posted as Sports Officer, Government D.K. P G College, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Paikash Beck, Aged About 61 Years, S/o Late Shri Birad Beck, Presently Posted as Sports Officer, Government E.R.R. P G Science College, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Union of India, Through Its Secretary, Department of Secondary And Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi- 110001

4. University Grants Commission, Through Its Secretary, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110001 ---- Respondents For State / Applicants :

Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board Per Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice 19.12.2016 1.

This application has been filed for clarification of the order dated 09.12.2014 passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 5608 of 2012. The final order which has been passed needs no clarification. What is the effect of the interim order is not for this Court to give any opinion at this stage. If the non-applicants No. 1 & 2 / writ petitioners have worked on the basis of the interim order, then the State will have to act

according to law to decide what action is to be taken. If the non-applicants No.1 & 2 have worked under the interim order, they will have to be paid for the period they have worked. 2.

The MCC is dismissed accordingly.

Sd/- Sd/- (Deepak Gupta) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Subbu