Narendra Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6098 of 2016 Narendra Singh Rajput, son of Shri Ramji Singh Rajput, aged about 35 years, working as Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Middle School Khairbana Kala, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham (CG). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur District Raipur (CG). 2.

Director, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

3.

Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (CG). 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham (CG). 5.

Block Education Officer, Bodla, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham (CG).

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Harish Khuntiya, Advocate.

For State : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/11/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of suspension has been revoked by respondent No.4 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham but salary has not been paid during the suspension period by the said authority and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation before the respondent No.4.

To which, counsel for the State has no objection. (3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent No.4 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham. If such representation is made by the petitioner, the said authority shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner along with this order. (5) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

(6) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion of the merits of the case and the competent authority may decide the representation on its own merits in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-