Rohit Ram Nirala v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5234 of 2017 Rohit Ram Nirala S/o Late Resham Lal Nirala, Aged About 70 Years R/o At Post Bhatgaon ( Nagar Panchayat ), Tahsil Bilaigarh, District. Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Education Officer, Balodabazar Bhatapara, District. Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer, Bilaigarh, District. Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents Shri K.P.Sahu, counsel for the petitioner/s.

Shri Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/10/2017 Heard on admission.

1.

The petitioner has claimed benefit of regular pay scale by submitting that he was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay. After sanction of pay scale, he was granted regular pay scale.

2.

According to the petitioner, once he completed period of probation, he is entitled for regular pay scale from initial date of appointment and this issue has already been decided in number of cases and similar orders have been passed by this Court including order dated 11/05/2011 in Writ Petition (S) No. 2549/2011. 3.

Considering the aforesaid submission, the claim of the petitioner shall also be considered and if it is found upon verification of facts that the petitioner is also similarly situated, concerned benefit should be given to the petitioner in accordance

with law.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti