Suresh Kumar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6365 of 2016 Suresh Kumar Kurre S/o Anand Ram, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village & Post Khamariya, Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur) (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director Panchayat Services, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, District Surguja (Ambikapur) (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Surguja (Ambikapur) (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Udaipur, District Surguja (Ambikapur) (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondents No. 1 to 3/State : Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 23/11/2016 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that against the order of termination, the petitioner has remedy to file appeal before the competent authority/appellate authority.

(2) In view of above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be permitted to prefer appeal before the competent authority/appellate authority and same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

(3) Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefer appeal before the competent authority/appellate authority for redressal of his grievances within 15 days from today, it is expected to be decided by the authority concerned within a period of three months from the date of presentation of appeal after noticing both the parties.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-