← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPL/188/2012disposed off

M/S Guru Dron Vidya Kutter Anors v. Union Of India And ORS

2018-07-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (L) No. 188 of 2012

1. M/s. Guru Dron Vidhya Kuteer through its Proprietor Faggu Lal Singh, S/o. Late Shri B.L. Singh, aged about 50 years, M/s. Guru Dron Vidya Kuteer, Near T.V. Tower, Chote Atarmuda, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Thana - Raigarh Kotwali 2.

Dilip Kumar Sahu, S/o. Tahsil Sahu, agede about 46 years, working as Principal in M/s Guru Dron Vidya Kuteer, Near T.V. Tower, Chote Atarmuda, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), P.S. Raigarh, Kotwali.

----Petitioner.

Versus

1.

Union of India through its Secretary, Employees Provident fund Organization, Ministry of Labour, Government of India, New Delhi 2.

Regional P.F. Commissioner-II & Central Public Information Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office Chhattigarh, Block 'D' Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsaik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur (C.G).- 492004 3.

Assistant P.F. Commissioner (Enf), Employees Provident fund Organization, Regional Office Chhattisgarh, Block 'D' Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsaik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) - 492004 4.

Enforcement Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office Chhattisgarh, Block 'D' Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsaik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) -492004 ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/07/201 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that final order dated 24.09.2012 passed under Section 7A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 is appealable before Central Government Industrial Tribunal (henceforth "CGIT") in accordance with law. 2.

In view of above, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be allowed to prefer appeal before the appellate authority i.e. CGIT and the same

may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

3.

Be that as it may, if the petitioners prefer appeal before the CGIT within a period of six weeks from today, the appellate authority shall consider and disposed of the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously after hearing the affected parties. 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-