← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3513/2018disposed off

Rambaran Singh Tomar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-05-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 3513 OF 2018

1. Rambaran Singh Tomar S/o Badan Singh Aged About 58 Years Subject Matter Speicialist-3, Office Of Sub Divsional Officer, Agricultural Officer, Baikunthpur, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Directorate Of Agriculture, Labhandi, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Commissioner, Agricultural Produce, State Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Joint Director, Agriculture Surguja, Region, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

5. Deputy Director, Agriculture, Korea, District Korea, Chhattisgarh.

6. Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Baikunthpur, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 15.05.2018

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the ACRs which was communicated to him for the year 2013-14 and 2016-17. The petitioner has made representation to the higher authorities for upgrading the ACRs given to him and that the entries made in the ACRs have with a mala fide intention. The said representation of the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent No.2 since long.

2. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this court does not intend to keep this petition pending any further. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

3. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation of the petitioner purely in accordance with rules applicable. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder