High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1464/2019disposed off

Ashok Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1464 of 2019

1. Ashok Kumar S/o Tijau Ram Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Turkadih, Tahsil Takhatpur, Disrtict- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Dhannu Kumar S/o Shri Tijau Ram Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Turkadih, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Bhagmati W/o Tijau Ram Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Turkadih, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Of Sub Division Bilaspur, Head Office, Bilaspur, Disrtict- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. National Highway Authority Of India Ltd. Through Project Director, Bilaspur Unit, Abhilasha Parisar, New Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Kamal Kishore Patel, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri Avinash Singh, PL For Respondent No.4 :

Shri B. Gopa Kumar, ASG for the Union of India Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 22/04/2019

1. Heard.

2. In the present petition, it is contended that though the land of the petitioners was acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation granted on the basis of the Notification dated 04.01.2017, which was published in an

extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioners have made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioners make a fresh representation before Respondent No.2, the Respondent No.2 shall decide the same objectively within a period of 3 Months.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu