Ghulam Mohammad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPCR No. 324 of 2016

1. Ghulam Mohammad, S/o. Late Abdul Miyan, Aged About 80 Years.

2. Mohammad Aamir Khan, S/o. Ghulam Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years. Both are R/o. Village Parla, Post Madai, P.S. Bango, Tehsil Podi Uproda, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh .......Petitioners -Versus -

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Home (Police) Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police, Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Superintendent Of Police, Korba, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh

4. Station House Officer, Bango, Civil & Revenue District Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. Rohit Tripathi, Aged About 45 Years, Posted as Assistant Manager at Dilip Buildcon, Parla, Village Parla, Post Madai, P.S. Bango, Tehsil Podi Uproda, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Mahesh Das, S/o. Bechan Das, Aged About 40 Years, R/o. Village Parla, Post Madai, P.S. Bango, Tehsil Podi Uproda, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh

7. D. Shrinivasan, Aged About 45 Years, Posted as Project Manager at Dilip Buildcon, Parla, Village Parla, Post Madai, P.S. Bango, Tehsil Podi Uproda, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh .......Respondents iN Mr.

24.01.2017 Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Jain, Govt. Advocate with Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition has become infructuous.

In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Ashok Judge