Dinesh Tandon v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2595 of 2019 • Dinesh Tandon S/o Shri Sakharam Tandon Aged About 28 Years R/o Ranjhabhata, Police Station And Tehsil Navagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Janjgir Champa CG ---- Respondent For applicant Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, Adv.

For Respondent/State Mr. Vikram Dixit, Govt. Adv.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 30-41. This is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and his no bail application is pending before any other court.

2. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 673/3018 registered in police station Janjgir, Janjgir Champa (CG) for offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 201/34 of IPC.

3. Perused the case diary.

4. Prosecution story in brief is that applicant had filed some alleged forged bills in a claim case filed on behalf of his minor child before the MACT, Janjgir Champa. It is alleged that co-accused Ramkripal had prepared the forged bills and handed over it to the applicant.

5. Counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has no criminal background. He is innocent and falsely implicated. He further submits that co-accused Ramkripal has been bailed out by this Court and case of the applicant is not different from that of co-accused Ramkripal. He drew my attention on the order of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Janjgir dated 15-3-2019. Hence he may be released on bail.

6. Case of the applicant is totally different from that of co-accused Ramkripal who has been enlarged on bail by this Court. In the case in hand, the applicant has filed the alleged forged bills in the said Court.

7. On the other hand, the State Counsel opposed the bail application. However no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant.

8. Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the evidence available on record and seriousness of the alleged offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant.

9. Consequently, the MCRC is dismissed.

SD/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge pathak