High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2175/2017disposed off

Mohanlal Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-05-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2175 of 2017 • Mohanlal Dewangan S/o. Gannulal Dewangan, Aged About 61 Years R/o. Quarter No. C- 13, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Police Station & Post Civil Lines, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Urban Administration & Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Urban Administration Development Department, Directorate, Raipur, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sakari, Disrict Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner :

Shri Vikram Dixit, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, PL for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 09/05/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been transferred thrice within a period of one year. He would submit that the petitioner has complied two previous transfer orders by joining at the transferred place.

2. Considering the fact that the petitioner appears to have been subjected to frequent transfer as in the present impugned order he has been transferred

from Municipal Council, Sirgitti to Municipal Council, Sakri and the petitioner is a Class-III employee, ends of justice would be served if the writ petition is disposed of with direction that in the event the petitioner prefers representation within a period of 15 days from today before the Secretary of the concerned department, the said Secretary shall consider and decide petitioner's representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of 4 weeks.

3. Till the petitioner's representation is decided or for a period of six weeks, whichever is earlier, the impugned order shall remain stayed in respect of the petitioner and he shall be allowed to continue at Municipal Council, Sirgitti.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA ashu