Deendayal Swarnkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7068 of 2016 Deendayal Swarnkar S/o Shri Durga Prasad Soni, Aged About 62 Years R/o Dalli Road, Ward No 4, Banupratappur, Kanker Distirct Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya Mahandi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Zonal General Manager Forest Range Raipur, Chhattisgarh State Foret Development Corporation B 7, Sector 2, Devendra Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Managing Director, Forest Range Raipur, Chhattisgarh State Foret Development Corporation B-7, Sector-2, Devendra Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Divisional Manager, Antagarh, Project, Division Bhanupratappur, Distirct Kanker Chhattisgarh

5. Deputy Divisional Manager, Forest Range Bhanupratappur, Distirct Kanker Chhattisgarh

6. Project Area Officer, Forest Range Bhanupratappur, Distirct Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Badal Lal Bhardwaj, Advocate For State :

Mr.Ashish Surana, P.L.

For Res.No.2 to 5 :

Mr.V.R.Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06/02/2017 1.

Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 6 submits that order is appealable before the appellate authority.

2.

In view of above, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority challenging the stoppage of one increment and also permitted to make representation against the charge-sheet.

3.

The petitioner is permitted to do so. If the petitioner prefers appeal/representation before the competent authority, the competent authority would do well and decide the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously after hearing other side.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-