Krishna Kumar Singaur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2360 of 2020

1. Krishna Kumar Singaur S/o Late Shri Genda Ram Singaur, Senior Assistant, Paryavas Bhavan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, C.G. 492002

2. Ganesh Rao Gautam S/o Late Shri Shriram Gautam, Senior Assistant, Chhattisgarh Housing Board Division No. 2, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Ballu Ram Fekar S/o Late Shri Meghnath Fekar, O/o Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Division No. 1, Ring Road No. 2, Sirpur Bhavan, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh - 492099 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, C.G. Housing And Environment Department, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492002

2. Commissioner, C.G. Housing Board Paryavaas Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492002

3. Administrative Officer, C.G. Housing Board, Paryavaas Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Tanmay Thomas, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

For Respondent No. 2 & 3 :

Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 23/06/2020

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were

initially appointed as Assistant in the year 1995, subsequently they were promoted to the post of Senior Assistant on 03.12.2014. Subsequently, the petitioners were to be promoted to the post of Accountant, however one person was promoted and despite the fact that 3 posts were lying vacant they were not being promoted and according to the Chhattisgarh Public Service (Promotion) Rules, 2003 the petitioners require consideration for promotion.

3. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3 would submit that the respondents are ready and willing to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion on its own merits and shall decide the representation filled by the petitioners (Annexure P-4).

4. Under the said facts, since the submission is made by respondents No. 2 & 3 that they would consider the eligibility of the petitioners for the promotion and shall decide their representation collectively filled from 19.02.2018, 07.09.2018 & 18.11.2019, no further adjudication at this stage would be required by this Court. Let respondents No. 2 & 3 shall consider the representation of the petitioners for consideration for promotion to higher post to which they are entitled according to their own merits. It is directed that respondents No. 2 & 3 shall start the said procedure of consideration within a period of 3 weeks and shall conclude the same within a further period of 4 months from the date for receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti