M/S. Surya Road Lines v. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporataion Limited

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1715 of 2017 • M/s. Surya Road Lines Through Their Authorised Partner Mr. G.R. Mahobiya (Ghasi Ram Mahobiya), S/o Nanki Ram Mahobiya, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Near Sharada Mandir, New Chandaniyapara, Near Water Tank, Janjgeer, Tahsil Janjgeer, District- Janjgeer-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporataion Limited Through Its Managing Director, Hitvad Bhawan, Awanti Vihar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Tender Evaluation Committee, Through: The District Manager, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Mungeli, Tahsil & District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

3. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Capital Complex, Tahsil: Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Raj Kamal Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Shri N.K. Vyas, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 04.07.2017 1.

We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation and the learned Additional Advocate General.

2.

As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for Respondent No.1 / Corporation, the issue raised in this petition is covered against the Corporation in terms of the contents of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court which is produced along with Writ Petition as Annexure- P/2.

3.

We have perused the said judgment. We are inclined to follow it and accordingly order this writ petition directing that the Petitioner's case will also be governed by same orders and directions as were issued by this Court in WPC No. 1628 of 2016 and connections (Annexure - P/2). Let the needful be done in accordance with the aforesaid judgment at the earliest. It will be open to the 1st Respondent to re-tender or consider the offer of the Petitioner. 4.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Chief Justice Judge Chandra