← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6880/2016disposed off

Rajkumar Kurrey v. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited

2016-12-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.6880 of 2016

1. Rajkumar Kurrey S/o Late Mukutram Kurrey, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Gatora, P.S. And Tahsil Masturi, Distirct Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

2. Dhirendra Kumar S/o Shri Rajkumar Kurrey, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Gatora, P.S. And Tahsil Masturi, Distirct Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited Thorugh Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Post Office Ujjawal Nagar, Sipat P.S. Sipat Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

2. Assistant General Manager, Human Resources Department N.T.P.C. Ltd. Sipat Post Office Ujjawal Nagar, P. S. Sipat Tahsil Mastri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

3. National Thermal Power Corporation, Through Its Chief Managing Director, Scope Complex, 7, Institutional Area Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110003

4. The Collector, Bilaspur, Distirct Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 495001

5. Sub Divisional Officer, ( Revenue ) Tahsil Masturi, Distirct Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Avinash Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Smt. Aastha Shukla, PL S.B. :

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 20/12/2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners land have been subjected to acquisition by the NTPC, but employment in lieu of the land acquired has not been provided to the petitioners. He would further submit that the petitioners have made a representation, which has not been considered and decided by respondent No.1.

2.

Be that as it may, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners regarding employment in accordance with law preferably within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with fresh representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane