← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3320/2018dismissed

Smt. Tarla Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3320 of 2018 Smt. Tarla Sahu W/o Shri Kranti Lal Sahu, Aged About 47 Years, Occupation - Service, Working As Shikshak Panchayat, Government Middle School, Dagori, Block Bilha, District- Bilaspur, Presently Working At Government Middle School - Hafa, Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, New Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat - Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Block Education Officer, Block- Bilha District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Block Education Officer, Block Takhatpur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Dagori, Block Bilha District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Head Master, Government Middle School- Hafa, Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri D.Kushwaha, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/04/2018 1.

The limited prayer that the petitioner has made before this court in the present Writ Petition is for issuing the directions to the respondent No.1 for posting the petitioner at the Government Middle School, Hafa, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.).

2.

Perusal of record would show that there is already an order in this regard in favour of the petitioner passed on 06/11/2017. 3.

As such, this Court does not find the order of the respondents by which the petitioner could feel aggrieved of. This Court would entertain the Writ Petition only in the event of an adverse order having been passed by the respondents.

4.

As on date, there is no action on part of the respondents which could be said to be detrimental to the service conditions of the petitioner. 5.

Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any strong case made out in favour of the petitioner. 6.

The Writ Petition thus deserve to be and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE