Smt. Sadhna Pathak v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2214 of 2017 Smt. Sadhna Pathak W/o Hemchand Pathak, Aged About 47 Years R/o Dillakapura, Police Station Kerakat, District Jonpur, Uttar Pradesh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police) New Raipur Mantralaya, New Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. The Director General Of Police, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. The Inspector General Of Police Range, Koriya, Civil And Revenue Koriya, (Chhattisgarh)
4. The Collector, Koriya, Civil And Revenue District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Superintendent Of Police, Koriya, Civil And Revenue District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh)
6. District Magistrate, Chirmiri Civil And Revenue District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh)
7. Station House Officer, Police Station Kerakat, Civil And Revenue District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh)
8. Gyanchand Dubey S/o Arun Kumar Dubey, Aged About 24 Years R/o Old G.M. Office, Haldibadi, Police Station Chirmiri, Civil & Revenue District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
9. Arun Kumar Dubey, S/o Ramashankar Dubey, Aged About 56 Years R/o Old G.M. Office, Haldibadi, Police Station Chirmiri, Civil & Revenue District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
10.
Anup Kumar Dubey S/o Arun Kumar Dubey, Aged About 29 Years R/o Old G.M. Office, Haldibadi, Police Station Chirmiri, Civil & Revenue District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
11.
Smt. Urmila Devi W/o Arun Kumar Dubey, Aged About 50 Years R/o Old G.M. Office, Haldibadi, Police Station Chirmiri, Civil & Revenue District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr.Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Res.No.1 to 7 :
Mr.Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 11/08/2017 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on account of dowry death of her daughter the petitioner has made an application for grant of compensation in view of the circular of the State Government dated 3.8.2011, but that has not been considered and decided by the State.
2.
Be that as it may, respondent No.4/Collector, Koriya is directed to consider and take a decision on the petitioner's application within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-