Gangadeen Mandavi And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THEHOITBLEJIIGHCOURT OJ^CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.C.G. N0.

(^JL OFr20iC&) ^-^-^ PETITIONERS ^- 1.

Gangadeen Mandavi S/o.

Late Shri Bhanjan Singh, aged about years;

Occupation Service, Posted as LDT Adivasi Balak Ashram, Samnapur, , Police Station SE Tahsil-Bodla, Civil and Revenue District- Karibdham (CG) Anil Kumar Yadu S/o. Late Shri Mangal Yadu, aged about^-43 years, Occupation Service, Posted as LDT Adviasi Balak Ashram Samnapur, Post Samnapur, Police Station & Tahsil-Bodla, Civil and Revenue District- Karibdham (CG) 3.

Dhan Sai Rakse S/o. Late Shri Ganpat Sai Rakse, aged about 49 years, Occupation Service, Posted as LDT Adviasi Balak Ashram Pandariya Jangal , Post -Usarwahi Police Station 8s Tahsil-Bodla, Civil and Revenue DistrictKaribdham ,(CG) Versus.

RESPONDENTS 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2.

Secretary, School Education Department, State of "- Chhattisgarh, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.

Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 4.

Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kabirdham, Dista-ict Kabirdham (CG) 5.

District Education Officer, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (CG) 6.

Collector (Tribal Development), - Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (CG) APPLICA'nOJ? FOR MODIFICA'nON OF ORDER DATED ^ l^ 11.02.2014 PASSED IN W.P. (S) N0. 652/2014''

/• HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Division Bench :

Hon'ble Shri Justice T.P.Sharma & Hon'ble Shri Justice C.B.Bajpai M.C.C.No.01 of 2015 Petitioners Gangadeen Mandavi and others Vs.

State of Chhattisgarh and others Resoondents Applicationformodificationof Orderdatedl 1-02-2014passed in W.P.(S) No.652/2014

Present:

Smt: Indira Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Additional Advocate General forthe State.

ORDER

(02-02-2015) Per T.P.Sharma. J.

This is petition for modification of order dated 11-02-2014 passed in W.P.(S) No.652/2014.

^ .

£.

ShriA&Kachhawaha, Additional Advocate GSneral submits that he has talked with fhe concerned Secretarv to insure that he will decide the representation of the petitioners within 3 weeks from today. Considering the statement made by the Additional Advocate General, the petition stands disposed ofon the basis ofaforesaid submission. No order as to cost.

S6//-'

C.B. BAJPAI Judge '

Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge Aadil