← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2866/2019disposed off

Priyaranjan Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2866 of 2019 Priyaranjan Singh S/o Late Mangalcharan Singh, Aged About 59 Years In Charge Block Education Officer, Kusmi, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj , Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Public Instructions, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Balrampur - Ramanujganj, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

4. Dharmendra Yadav, Block Education Officer, Kusmi, Block Kusmi, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16/04/2019

1. The dispute in the present writ petition which the petitioner has raised is in respect of the handing over the charge of the Block Eucation Officer to the respondent No. 4 .

2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner rather would get redressed in case if the respondent State takes a decision for filling up of the post of Block Education Officer by persons who fulfill all requisite eligibility criteria as per the rules. Further contention of the petitioner is that

there are more than couple of blocks in the same District where the petitioner is working but the charge of Block Education Officer has been occupied by the persons who are basically Lecturers and not Principals and the petitioner in spite of being Principal and fulfilling all eligibility criteria has not been considered for posting as a Block Education Officer.

3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, let petitioner make a suitable representation in addition to what he has already made to the respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 1 in turn shall take an appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner keeping in view the rules and regulations governing the field of posting of the Block Education Officer.

4. It is expected that respondent would take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of filing of the fresh representation by the petitioner.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit