Dr. Pankaj Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7000 of 2016

1. Dr. Pankaj Verma S/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 28 Years R/o Pachpedi Naka, Ring Road No. 1, Nav-Jivan Society At Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Dr. Prasant Kumar Gupta S/o Ravi Shankar Gupta, Aged About 29 Years R/o Machitrakar Office, Behind Ware House Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Dr. Junaind Malik S/o Mohd. Mustak Malik, Aged About 30 Years Marwahi, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Dr. Firoz Khan S/o Ajmal Khan Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Machkhanda, Post Nargoda, Tahsil Seepat District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Health Services Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Directorate Of Health Services, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Y.S. Thakur, Addl. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 17/04/2017 1) By this petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction to conclude the selection process.

2) The respondents have made the following statement in para 9 of the return :

9.

It is submitted that as soon as the appointment with regard to appointed 349 candidates will resolve and concluded, the candidates like the petitioner who are in waiting list would be considered for appointment. It is submitted that there is shortage of doctors in the government hospital and therefore, the State Government is also keen to make appointment. However, the appointment orders will be issued after following due process of law. That 181 candidates have been placed in waiting list including the petitioners. Their cases would be considered after concluding the process of appointment of 349 candidates, who have been given appointment vide order dated 3/8/2016.

3) In view of the above, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri