← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7003/2016disposed off

Raghunandan Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7003 of 2016 Raghunandan Thakur S/o Late D.S. Thakur, Aged About 60 Years Lecturer, Govt. Middle School Bharritola 36, District Balod Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer, Balod, District Balod, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension, Durg, District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/12/2016 Heard on admission.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per circular dated 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 24 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) to which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

-22.

Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3.

In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha