Smt.Aarti Toppo v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURICGl W.P.^gfNO.

1^^ / 2015 ^f ^ 17?

^ PETITIONER Smt. Aarti Toppo W/o Subal Pradhan, aged about years, R/o Village - Nadigaon, Tahsil - Baramkela, Police Station - Baramkela, Civil 85 Revenue Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1.

State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

2. 'Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3.

Returning Officer, Panchayat Election, Block - Baranikela, Distt.

Raigarh ,(C.G.) Divisional Officer 4.

Sub (Revenue), Sarangarh, Distt.

Raigarh (C.G.) 5.

Padma @ Snehlata W/o Bhajan Lal Sidar, aged about years, R/o Nadigaon, Tahsil - Baramkela, Distt.

Raigarh (C.G.) 6.

Premlal Sidar W/o Shri Krishna Sidar, aged about 26 years, R/o Nadigaon, Tahsil - Baramkela, Distt.

Raigarh (C.G.)

WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(C)No.178of2015 PETITIONER Smt. Aarti Toppo

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General for the State. SINGLEBENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANTKUMAR MISHRA. J.

ORAL ORDER (02/02/2015) Petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking quashment of the nomination papers of respQndents No. 6 & 7 for the office of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, INacligadn, District Raigarh. , 2.

t.eameEl counsel would submit that since election.has already taken placg, this writ petition has become infructuous, however, he seeks liberty to prefer an election petition under the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993.

3.

Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with aforesaid liberty. V...

Prashant Kumar Judge